Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201104902

  • Case ref:
    201104902
  • Date:
    July 2012
  • Body:
    Scottish Water
  • Sector:
    Water
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    Policy/administration

Summary
Ms C complained that Scottish Water pipes ran across her land but that Scottish Water were not paying her for use of it. She said that an electricity company paid her in respect of cables and pylons on her land. She also complained that Scottish Water staff accessed her land without notice, which had serious implications in respect of the dogs and horses on the land.

We confirmed to Ms C that Scottish Water had correctly explained the legal situation regarding payment for use of land in these circumstances, and they were not required to pay her. We explained that regulatory and legislative requirements for the water industry are not always the same as those for the gas and electricity industries.

We also explained to Ms C that Scottish Water had the right to access her land without notice in emergency situations but that, in other cases, they had to give 24 hours' notice. However, there was no evidence that Ms C had reported any incidents of access without notice before she submitted her complaint. Scottish Water also told us that she had confirmed verbally to them that she had not made any such reports. This meant that it was not possible for either Scottish Water or this office to investigate what had happened (for example, whether anyone who had accessed her land without permission had, in fact, been a Scottish Water employee). However, we were satisfied that Scottish Water had given Ms C appropriate advice about contacting their call centre as soon as any such incident happened and that they had reminded relevant staff of the requirement to give notice.

Updated: March 13, 2018