Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201104974

  • Case ref:
    201104974
  • Date:
    October 2012
  • Body:
    Fife Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

In 2008, Ms C wanted to create a driveway into her property. She asked the council for advice, and they wrote to her with this saying that planning permission was not needed. They outlined the circumstances in which it would be needed and who she should contact should she wish to have the kerb dropped. Based on that advice Ms C created the driveway. More than two and a half years later the council contacted her to say that they wanted her to either purchase a piece of land at the edge of the road (which they owned and which she had used in creating the driveway) or re-instate it. Ms C complained to the council but remained dissatisfied with their response and complained to us.

We found that in 2008 the council had not explained to her that they had responded in their role as planning authority, and that she also needed to get the consent of the council in a different role as owner of the piece of land. We upheld Ms C's complaints.

Recommendations

We recommended that the council:

  • apologise to Ms C; and
  • consider waiving their administration charges for any sale of the land.

 

Updated: March 13, 2018