Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision Report 201300831

  • Case ref:
    201300831
  • Date:
    October 2013
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Mr C, who is a prisoner, complained that the prison failed to follow the correct process when reviewing his supervision level. In particular, he said the prison updated their computer record before the relevant manager considered his written representations and signed off the paperwork.

In relation to the assignment of a supervision level, the prison rules confirm that the governor must consider any representations made by the prisoner before making a decision. In Mr C's case, that did not happen and the prison acknowledged this. In light of the failing identified in Mr C's case, we upheld his complaint. The prison advised that they had reviewed their procedure and confirmed that all potential increases in supervision level would not be amended on the computer record until prisoners' written representations had been considered and the relevant paper signed off by the appropriate manager.

Updated: March 13, 2018