-
Case ref:202206587
-
Date:June 2024
-
Body:A Medical Pratice in the Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board area
-
Sector:Health
-
Outcome:Upheld, recommendations
-
Subject:Clinical treatment / diagnosis
Summary
C complained that the practice had prescribed them with Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) for a period of approximately four months despite knowing that they were trying to conceive. C said that they had subsequently attended a fertility clinic and were advised by a specialist that HRT would have a negative impact on their fertility. The practice identified learning and improvement from C’s complaint. They apologised to C for the frustration and distress caused to them by their experience.
We took independent advice from a GP adviser. We found that it was unclear from the medical records if the prescription of HRT was fully discussed with C to ensure that they understood the implications on their fertility and general health. We found that it was unreasonable for the practice to have prescribed C with HRT in the absence of their clear informed decision. Therefore, we upheld the complaint.
Recommendations
What we asked the organisation to do in this case:
- Apologise to C for the prescription of HRT in the absence of their clear informed decision. The apology should meet the standards set out in the SPSO guidelines on apology available at www.spso.org.uk/information-leaflets.
We have asked the organisation to provide us with evidence that they have implemented the recommendations we have made on this case by the deadline we set.