Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201102085

  • Case ref:
    201102085
  • Date:
    March 2012
  • Body:
    Aberdeenshire Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    repairs and maintenance of housing stock (incl dampness and infestations)

Summary
Mrs C was awarded a grant through the Housing (Scotland) Act 1987 for repairs to her house roof. As the initial contractors could not carry out the works quickly enough, Mrs C obtained a further contractor directly who proceeded to carry out the works.
Once the contractor completed the works, they applied for payment of the grant. The works were inspected by a council officer and the grant monies paid. Mrs C was not happy with the quality of the works and complained that the council should not have paid the monies. The council had inspected the works and had requested further works be carried out before payment of the grant.

As it was Mrs C who instructed the contractor, she had a legal relationship with them and would normally be able to pursue them for any problems with the work. The contractor appeared, however, to be no longer trading. We found that the council did not have a responsibility to monitor or guarantee the works. We established they had inspected the works which were completed to their satisfaction for the purposes of making the grant payment. For this reason we were satisfied that the council had acted appropriately and we did not uphold this complaint.
 

Updated: March 13, 2018