Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201103666

  • Case ref:
    201103666
  • Date:
    November 2012
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Some upheld, action taken by body to remedy, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C, an advocacy worker, complained on behalf of Miss A, who had injured her knee in a skiing accident. Miss A was referred by the board to a hospital outwith their area. However, the board for her own area also provided some treatment and investigated and responded to Mrs C's formal complaint. Mrs C complained that the board provided inadequate explanations in response to her complaints and that the board's handling of the complaint was poor.

We were satisfied that, whilst the board's investigation of the complaint was delayed, updates were sent in line with their complaints procedure. That said, we found that the board's initial response to the complaint contained a number of inaccuracies, particularly in relation to some of the dates of events and their description of the operation that Miss A underwent. We noted, however, that the board had accepted this and apologised to Mrs C and Miss A so we made no recommendations.

Updated: March 13, 2018