Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201104344

  • Case ref:
    201104344
  • Date:
    October 2012
  • Body:
    Business Stream Ltd
  • Sector:
    Water
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    charging method / calculation

Summary

Mr C's business moved into new premises on 1 April 2011. He was unaware of his liability to pay for water and waste water services, believing that these were included in utility payments to the landlord. During a routine audit, Business Stream identified the premises as a gap site (a site which had been receiving water without being charged for it). They set up an account for Mr C's business in September 2011 and issued a backdated bill for estimated water usage. Mr C disputed the charges and his account was reassessed. Although his water usage was reassessed and his bills reduced, he complained that he was still required to pay the higher rate for the period prior to reassessment.

We were satisfied that Business Stream followed the correct procedure for reassessing water usage as set out in guidance issued by the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. This procedure requires licensed providers to backdate the reassessed rate to the date of the request for reassessment, but does not allow for further backdating. We were satisfied with Business Stream's handling of Mr C's account prior to his reassessment request and found no grounds for further backdating of the reassessed rate.

Updated: March 13, 2018