Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision Report 201204604

  • Case ref:
    201204604
  • Date:
    December 2013
  • Body:
    The Highland Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    handling of application (complaints by opponents)

Summary

Mr C complained about the council's handling of planning consents for a site next to his property. Four different consents were approved, including permission for the developer to have a static caravan on the site during construction work. However, the developer kept a caravan on site, in the wrong location, without carrying out any of the approved work. Mr C complained that the council failed to use their enforcement powers to have the caravan removed. He also complained that the council deliberately delayed in responding to his correspondence.

We took independent advice from one of our planning advisers, who explained that enforcement action cannot be taken about planning conditions until such time as the relevant consent is implemented by work starting on the site. As no work had started, it was questionable whether there were any grounds to take enforcement action. Despite this, the council served an enforcement notice requiring removal of the caravan by September 2015. Mr C was dissatisfied with this, as the original consent required the caravan to be removed by December 2012. However, as the caravan was allowed on site during construction, and the developer had until September 2015 to commence construction work (which is when the consent expires), we were satisfied that the council had reached a fair and reasoned decision. We were also satisfied that the council responded to Mr C's correspondence in reasonable time.

Updated: March 13, 2018