Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision report 201101546

  • Case ref:
    201101546
  • Date:
    June 2013
  • Body:
    Care Inspectorate
  • Sector:
    Scottish Government and Devolved Administration
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    complaints handling

Summary

Mr C is the manager of a facility catering for young people which is subject to regular inspection, initially by the Care Commission and, since 1 April 2011, by the Care Inspectorate. His complaint related to an incident that occurred during an inspection by Care Commission officers when he queried the lead officer's authorisation to inspect documents relating to one of his employees. As a result of the inspection, Mr C's facility was given what he considered to be ridiculously low gradings. Mr C complained that the Care Commission's inspection and subsequent report into his facility had been inadequate and that the Care Commission and Care Inspectorate failed to adequately handle his complaints.

Our investigation found that the Care Commission had followed their normal inspection process and the process of sharing their draft inspection report. We found no evidence of inadequacy in the handling of Mr C's complaint by the Care Commission or the review of complaint handling by the Care Inspectorate.

Updated: March 13, 2018