Festive closure

We will close at 5pm on Tuesday 24 December 2024 and reopen at 9am Friday 3 January 2025. You can still submit complaints through our online form, but we won't respond until we reopen.

Decision Report 201303986

  • Case ref:
    201303986
  • Date:
    April 2014
  • Body:
    Scottish Prison Service
  • Sector:
    Prisons
  • Outcome:
    Upheld, recommendations
  • Subject:
    policy/administration

Summary

Mr C complained that his supervision level in prison was raised from low to medium supervision without good reason. We explained to Mr C that decisions to change someone's supervision level are a matter for the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), not for us, and our only role in considering such a complaint is to see whether they followed their procedures in reaching the decision. During our investigation the SPS could not provide us with a particular form, which meant they could not evidence that the process was followed in Mr C's case. For that reason, we upheld his complaint.

Mr C also made various complaints about the way SPS handled his complaint. We considered that a number of his points did show that it had not been handled appropriately. For example, he was not given part of a complaint form which related to escalating his complaint to the next level in SPS; they did not address a significant part of his complaint; and there was some delay.

Recommendations

We recommended that SPS:

  • remind staff to retain completed PSS3 forms securely and in accordance with normal process;
  • remind the officers who held the internal complaints committee of the need to address issues raised when considering complaints; and
  • apologise to Mr C for the delay in the prison governor's reply.

Updated: March 13, 2018