Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Decision Report 201810379

  • Case ref:
    201810379
  • Date:
    August 2019
  • Body:
    Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board - Acute Services Division
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

Mrs C complained about the care and treatment which she received at the Royal Alexandra Hospital. She was in the hospital when her waters broke and there was a delay in transferring her to the labour ward. Mrs C underwent a caesarean section (surgical operation for delivering a child) and then went on to develop an infection which required antibiotics. Mrs C felt that the delay in transferring her to the labour ward was the cause of her infection.

We took independent advice from a consultant obstetrician (medical specialist in care of women before, during and after pregnancy) and gynaecologist (medical specialism in disorders of the female productive system) and found that Mrs C had received appropriate care and treatment. While there was a delay in transferring Mrs C to the labour ward, as it was busy at the time, Mrs C was kept under observation and there was no indication of problems with either her or her baby. Following the caesarean section Mrs C developed a temperature and appropriate blood tests were requested along with a medical review. Intravenous (into a vain) antibiotics (for possible infection) were started until the blood results were available. We did not uphold the complaint.

Updated: August 21, 2019