Festive closure

We will close at 5pm on Tuesday 24 December 2024 and reopen at 9am Friday 3 January 2025. You can still submit complaints through our online form, but we won't respond until we reopen.

Decision Report 202002453

  • Case ref:
    202002453
  • Date:
    July 2021
  • Body:
    Lanarkshire NHS Board
  • Sector:
    Health
  • Outcome:
    Not upheld, no recommendations
  • Subject:
    Clinical treatment / diagnosis

Summary

C complained about the psychiatric care and treatment that they received during an admission to University Hospital Wishaw. They complained about the way they had been treated by staff, claiming to have been assaulted and injured. C also complained about their medication regime, stating that they had been given too much medication which caused them to become ill.

In their response to our enquiries, the board set out the circumstances in which C had been restrained, explaining that C tried to run away from the ward and became verbally and physically aggressive. As C was detained under the Mental Health Act, their refusal to return to the ward resulted in the use of restraint using prevention and management of aggression techniques. The board said that the restraint techniques utilised by staff were appropriate and all staff involved were appropriately trained. They expressed regret that C's jacket had been damaged, advising that reimbursement for C's loss had not been paid because C had failed to provide a receipt as requested. While C complained about a separate incident in which they said that they were injured, there was no record of this and as such we could make no finding on this.

We took independent advice from a consultant psychiatrist. We found that the assessment and management of C's symptoms were appropriate. After review of C's medication regime, we found that there was no link with C becoming ill and vomiting. We noted signs of infection which were considered a more likely explanation for C vomiting.

We found that C's care and treatment were reasonable and we therefore did not uphold this complaint.

Updated: July 21, 2021