-
Case ref:201908832
-
Date:March 2021
-
Body:Dumfries and Galloway NHS Board
-
Sector:Health
-
Outcome:Not upheld, no recommendations
-
Subject:Clinical treatment / diagnosis
Summary
C's spouse (A) received care and treatment from the board for a recurrence of bowel cancer. C complained that the communication and actions by the board in relation to that were unreasonable.
C complained that the board failed to provide reasonable treatment to A. We took independent advice from a senior clinical oncologist (a doctor who specialises in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer). We found that the treatment offered to A was reasonable and in line with guidance. We did not uphold the complaint.
C complained that the board failed to provide reasonable care to A. We found that the board had acknowledged there were some failings relating to staff responding to care requests and there were challenges when a procedure was undertaken. Overall we found that while there were failings in specific instances, the care provided over the entire period was reasonable. On balance, we did not uphold the complaint.
C complained that the board failed to reasonably communicate with A and C in relation to A's diagnosis and the potential risks of treatment. We found, based on the written records available, that the communication was reasonable, noting that the written records could not illustrate the level of empathy exhibited by clinicians. The written records did demonstrate that the risks relating to treatment were discussed. We did not uphold the complaint.