Easter break office closure 

We will be closed from 5pm Thursday 17 April 2025 until 10am Tuesday 22 April 2025. You can still submit your complaint via our online form but we will not respond until we reopen.

New Customer Service Standards

We have updated our Customer Service Standards and are looking for feedback from customers. Please fill out our survey here by 12 May 2025: https://forms.office.com/e/ZDpjibqe8r 

Investigation Report 200500770

  • Report no:
    200500770
  • Date:
    June 2007
  • Body:
    East Ayrshire Council
  • Sector:
    Local Government

Overview
The complainant (Mr C) raised a number of concerns that the successful operation of his farm has been undermined by the East Ayrshire Council (the Council)'s decision to grant planning consent for a housing development next door to his farm. Additionally, as a result of this development, Mr C has had problems modernising his farm to comply with modern pollution and animal welfare requirements.

Specific complaints and conclusions
The complaints which have been investigated are that:

  • (a) the Building Control Department are unfairly insisting that new drainage be installed to deal with the roof water from the silage clamp roof (not upheld);
  • (b) the Planning Department failed to ensure that a planning condition in respect of planting for screening purposes was enforced (not upheld);
  • (c) the Planning Department failed to ensure that the condition for screen fencing and planting was transferred to the new application (not upheld);
  • (d) as a result of the failings in (b) and (c) above, Mr C had unfairly to include the provision of screen fencing in his application to construct his silage clamps (not upheld);
  • (e) Mr C was inappropriately advised to withdraw his application for a cubicle shed by Council officers when he should have been advised to amend the proposals (not upheld);
  • (f) the Council are putting too much emphasis on the decision of the Reporter rather than considering every application on its merits (not upheld);
  • (g) the Council should consider Mr C's application as permitted development as the Council did not exercise its right to comment on his proposals within the statutory time scale (not upheld); and
  • (h) the Council is not working with Mr C to try and resolve these outstanding matters (not upheld).

Redress and recommendations
The Ombudsman recommends that the Council:

  • (i) highlight to staff in the Planning Department the particular issues which can arise when Agricultural Prior Notification is received; and
  • (ii) continue to work closely with Mr C in an attempt to find acceptable solutions to both the outstanding building control and planning problems.

The Council have accepted the recommendations and will act on them accordingly.

 

Updated: December 11, 2018